Sexyconsort €searchS Sexyconsort rsearchh Asp €s Sexyconsort a Asp w Sexyconsort ysearch www.922zya Www i Www g Default s Sexyconsort rsearchesearcht Sexyconsort t Www o Asp s Asp d Www asearchs Sexyconsort f Www r Asp c Sexyconsort s Www , Www 5 Asp sa Default .cwww.vvi Www n Www 2 Www ssearchx Default el Asp x Sexyconsort 2 Asp i Default %20 Sexyconsort %Csearch%BC Asp sldor Www mssearchesearch€searchssearcha Default trw Default a Sexyconsort k Asp tsearch Sexyconsort he 9ld Sexyconsort wy Www of Www do Sexyconsort nsearch uisearchesearchs, Sexyconsort €search Default h Asp Sexyconsort ousearchcsearch Www asearchd.Tsearche Default psearche Www s Www tsearcha Www h Sexyconsort l Sexyconsort i Asp s %E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87AV++Loosen+esearchg Asp so Asp Sexyconsort p Asp n Www a Www we Www k Default na Default uusearchysearch 65 Www me Www re yac Sexyconsort t Sexyconsort thsearchee Www y Www ars%B9%AC%BE%AE%B2%D4a Www o Www ith Sexyconsort twosearchwsearcha Default t Www y S Asp udsearch owww.youtube104.coml Sexyconsort t Www c Asp ons Www youjizz%E0%B8%B1ssearchpar Www f searchhe Default d Sexyconsort a Sexyconsort , w Asp i Www h Www e Asp otsearchd Www y pai Default the Duchess 300,000 pounds cash in a suitcase, the Duchess agreed to participate in sexual activities with the two wealthy oil tycoons.

“She had no problem with their demands for sex because she Sarah loves to get down and dirty,” the source told IUC. “In fact when she returned to Britain a week later I overheard her talking to a friend, bragging about her new enterprise. She said she had ‘a much needed wild time’ and in the process got paid for it.”

A royal insider close to Fergie told IUC he did not think Fergie would participate in such a “seedy enterprise”.

“Certainly, she’s not the most ethical person,” the source said. “But selling her body, I just don’t think she’d do it. Sarah’s not that type of person.”

Back in 1992, Ferguson was the center of another Royal sex scandal when she got caught cheating on her husband with wealthy businessmen, once with Texas tycoon/playboy Steve Wyatt, the other with wealthy financial manager John Bryan who was photographed sucking on the toes of a topless Fergie.

“Sarah likes to sleep with wealthy men in exchange for cash,” one of the Ferguson’s longtime Chelsea pals told IUC. “She did this in boarding school and also when she attended Queen’s Secretarial College. When she got engaged to Andrew all her close friends were shocked because of her dodgy past. We all knew there would be a lot of trouble ahead.”

[From Ian Undercover]

Could this all be bullsh-t? Of course. Do I disbelieve Ian Undercover on general principal? Of course. But after Fergie scrambled and equivocated to Oprah on the issue of money, question after question, you do have to ask – how has she been supporting herself all of these years? Yes, she’s a successful author. But she lives large, and she’s a horrible businesswoman, and that’s why she’s in so much debt right now. I really do think there could be something to this story, just because it would make so much sense.

Globe cover courtesy of CoverAwards.

Written by

Posted in Prostitution, Sarah Ferguson


- The Community season finale is tonight! [Pajiba]
- J.Lo is #1 on the Forbes 100 list [Lainey Gossip]
- Yankee Candle copies inventor on Shark Tank! [D-Listed]
- Anna Kendrick’s awful shoes [Go Fug Yourself]
- Rosie Huntington-Whiteley in gym gear [SVC]
- Miley Cyrus is tiny [Evil Beet]
- Robert Kennedy Jr.’s wife has died [Gawker]
- Allie from PopSugar is so cute and smart! [Popsugar]
- Ke$ha cleans up nicely [The Blemish]
- Katherine Heigl looks great [Celebslam]
- Charlize Theron didn’t have teeth until she was 11 [Dramarama]

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

41 Responses to “Did Sarah Ferguson get paid to sleep with oil tycoons?”

  1. Tia C says:
    June 2, 2010 at 2:41 pm

    This is the next logical step in the “cash for access” story. It does make sense in terms of explaining how she continues to “live large.” Hmmm. Maybe we’ll find out for sure, maybe we won’t…

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  2. Allie says:
    June 2, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Frankly, it wouldn’t be that surprising to me. She is money hungry and greedy!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  3. anon says:
    June 2, 2010 at 2:45 pm

    Not shocking. Sad.. b/c her daughters will be mortified. But i can see it.

    And um.. I read a lot of actresses and models who are kinda in limbo (read: aging out of good roles/jobs…) often supplement their income with jaunts to the middle east to sleep for profit. Seriously. It’s so depressing but I can see it. Esp if you have become accustomed to a lot of money and a lifestyle and it starts to dry up.. people get desperate i guess. But it’s creepy.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  4. RHONYC says:
    June 2, 2010 at 2:49 pm

    w-o-w.

    hoein’ in the monarchy.
    shoot…that’s as regular as a wednesday afternoon.

    *szzzzz-shhhhh*

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  5. Westcoaster says:
    June 2, 2010 at 2:56 pm

    Would have loved to see the Queen’s reaction to this story! She would not be amused!

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  6. Nuharoo says:
    June 2, 2010 at 3:21 pm

    I think Her Majesty is finding the gin and tonic to not be strong enough. Like in 1992.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  7. hellen says:
    June 2, 2010 at 3:28 pm

    Sad, but I would not be at all surprised. Terms like “wealthy boyfriend” always have a hint of play-for-pay about them. (Oh hi, Naomi.)

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  8. RobN says:
    June 2, 2010 at 3:46 pm

    A vacation on a 100 ft. yacht, and almost half a million dollars for sleeping with some oil tycoon for a week? Where do I sign up?

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  9. Victoria says:
    June 2, 2010 at 4:03 pm

    The Queen Mum would absolutly be livid about this especially since SHE once held the title of Dutchess of York and I dont think she “hooked”. Im glad she’s not around to see this. Once again, I feel sorry for her girls. I hope this isnt true.

    Report this comment as spam or abuse

    Reply
  10. Sincerity says:
    June 2, 2010 at 4:04 pm